
Glamsterdam Makes Gas Assumptions a Test Suite, Not a Constant
Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade changes more than capacity. It turns gas, state access and builder interfaces into versioned dependencies teams must test.
Thousands of expertly written articles covering blockchain, cryptocurrency, Web3, AI, and decentralized technology — all interconnected through our knowledge graph.
20 articles

Ethereum’s Glamsterdam upgrade changes more than capacity. It turns gas, state access and builder interfaces into versioned dependencies teams must test.

Ethereum’s draft transaction-assertion design points to a better wallet standard: enforce the result a user accepts, not only the call they authorize.

Swift reports live tokenised payments across five currencies. Businesses should test usable customer funds and final interbank settlement as separate milestones.

The SEC’s temporary exemption opens a narrow path for tokenized-stock trading, but its real lesson is operational: rights, code, market controls and disclosures must stay aligned.

Ethereum’s new 2029 target is a useful commitment, not a forecast of quantum attacks. The next test is whether migration progress becomes measurable for the people building on it.

An upgradeable contract can keep the same address while its rules change. Here is how to assess upgrade authority, timelocks, compatibility and public accountability.

Five Books, Five Days: Download the Complete Mastering Crypto Series Free Cryptocurrency, blockchain, decentralized finance and Web3 are reshaping how people think about money, ownership, security and the internet. Yet for many people, entering this rapidly changing world can feel overwhelming. Wher

Spend enough time in the blockchain industry and you'll notice a familiar pattern. Every new Layer-1 blockchain claims to be faster. Higher throughput. More transactions per second. Lower latency. Bigger performance numbers. The race for speed has become one of the defining characteristics of modern

For years, blockchain advocates have argued that the technology could transform business. Supply chains. Financial systems. Digital identity. Asset management. Automation. Compliance. The list of potential applications continues to grow. Yet despite enormous investment and years of development,...

If you've spent any time in the blockchain industry, you've probably seen the numbers. 10,000 transactions per second. 50,000 transactions per second. 100,000 transactions per second. Sometimes even higher. These figures are often used as proof that one blockchain is superior to another. Higher tran

For much of blockchain's history, attention has been focused on the visible parts of the industry. New tokens. Price movements. Memecoins. Celebrity endorsements. Marketing campaigns. Partnership announcements. The headlines have often centered around speculation and narrative-driven growth rather..

There’s a strong instinct in blockchain to put everything on-chain. If a system is being built, the assumption is often that it should live entirely within the blockchain environment—fully decentralized, fully transparent, and fully executed on-chain. But in practice, that approach creates more prob

Enterprise blockchain pilots don’t usually fail because of technology. The networks work. The tools exist. The infrastructure is often capable of supporting what’s being tested. And yet, many pilots never move beyond the experimental phase. They stall, lose momentum, or quietly disappear. The reason

One of the biggest misconceptions about blockchain is that it needs to replace existing systems. The narrative often suggests a complete overhaul—new infrastructure, new processes, and a full transition away from traditional technology stacks. But that’s not how adoption actually happens. In reality

Decentralization is often positioned as the defining feature of blockchain. It removes intermediaries. It distributes control. It creates systems that operate without a single point of authority. For many in the space, that’s the goal. But for enterprises, the conversation looks very different. Ente

Most blockchain networks can operate. Far fewer can sustain themselves. In the early stages, many systems rely on external inputs—funding, incentives, speculation, and constant attention—to maintain activity. These factors can drive growth temporarily, but they don’t guarantee long-term viability. A

There’s a common assumption in blockchain that fewer limits lead to better systems. Lower fees, faster transactions, higher throughput—these are often seen as pure advantages. The idea is that removing friction will naturally lead to more usage and better outcomes. But in practice, systems without c

In blockchain, numbers can be misleading. High transaction counts, large trading volumes, and constant movement of tokens often create the impression of a thriving ecosystem. From the outside, it looks like strong adoption and continuous growth. But not all activity is the same. There’s a critical d

Token burns are one of the most widely used mechanisms in blockchain. The concept is simple: reduce supply over time, increase scarcity, and theoretically drive value. It’s an appealing idea, especially in markets where supply dynamics play a visible role in price movement. But there’s a problem. Bu

Token design is often discussed in terms of price. Supply, demand, emissions, burns, incentives—most conversations focus on how these elements influence market value. Charts, volatility, and speculation tend to dominate the narrative. But price is only one outcome of token design. The more important