Tokenomics: When Tokens Beat Equity
Katya Malinova, Andreas Park
Abstract
Malinova and Park investigate the competitive landscape between blockchain-based tokens and traditional equity financing. The paper argues that tokens offer unique advantages in information asymmetry reduction and liquidity provision, particularly for projects in nascent stages. By utilizing corporate finance theory, the authors compare the incentive alignment features of token-based projects against those of venture-backed firms. The analysis demonstrates that tokens can resolve specific agency problems that equity cannot, specifically regarding direct user engagement and network effect bootstrapping. However, the study also notes the trade-off in legal and regulatory clarity. This work is highly significant for entrepreneurs and investors navigating the choice between traditional venture capital models and initial coin offerings or token generation events, providing an empirical basis for the 'token superiority' thesis in specific market conditions.
Key Findings
- 1Tokens provide superior incentive alignment for user-led projects compared to traditional equity.
- 2Tokens effectively mitigate specific agency problems through direct participation.
- 3Liquidity provision via tokens offers a more flexible exit mechanism than traditional equity markets.
- 4Regulatory uncertainty remains the primary friction point for the adoption of tokenized financing.
Topics
Citation
BibTeX
@misc{tokenomicswhen2023,
title = {Tokenomics: When Tokens Beat Equity},
author = {Katya Malinova and Andreas Park},
year = {2023},
howpublished = {\url{https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4882}},
}Knowledge Explorer
Explore Related Concepts
See how Tokenomics: When Tokens Beat Equity connects to glossary terms, books, and other research in the Knowledge Graph.